| [includepage/verticalindexlhs.htm]
|
|
[includepage/coretable100.htm]

Please use HM forum
for discussions regarding funding.
=========================
The following is the result of the support and
suggestions of
many individuals in our forums.
|
HairSite
Research Fund
An Introduction |
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1) Objectives
2) Focus
3) Format: Investing vs Unencumbered Funding
4) Format: Registered Charitable Organization
vs Simplified Funding
5) Evaluation Process - Preliminary Screening
vs Final Screening
6) Media Kits
7) Your Help
8) Preliminary Screening -
interim status report. |
|
OBJECTIVES |
1) To foster collecting
funding efforts aiming to expedite research and development in some
of the most promising researches in hair restoration.
2) To intensify competition among various researchers in hair
restoration so
that the consumers can benefit from competitive pricing and a
broader
selection of treatment options. |
|
FOCUS |
1) Instead of dispersing
financial contributions aimlessly to any researchers who is experimenting
with new techniques in hair restoration, our goal is to channel
unencumbered funding to the selected few who are the most promising
in bringing us the next breakthrough in hair loss treatment.
2) Instead of focusing on researches in gene therapy, which may be
more than ten years away according to some researchers, our primary
focus is on hair multiplication / tissue engineering which many
believe to be about 5 years away |
|
FORMAT
INVESTING vs UNENCUMBERED FUNDING |
|
Jim and Ali suggested a
very intriguing idea. If we fund a particular research as
investors in exchange for a minority share of the project, not
only do we get our hair back, we will have a small profit from the
eventual sale of the treatment as well.
Unfortunately, most
researchers whom we contacted in the past two months (see interim
status report) indicated that they are already fully
funded and do not require any additional funding, unencumbered or
otherwise.
On the other hand, researchers who may be open to funding are all
associated with universities and hospitals. In most instances,
these institutions are already bounded by existing grants and
funding by-laws which make it difficult for them to negotiate an
investing or licensing agreement with anyone without violating the
provisions of existing grants and funding.
We might have a better
chance negotiating an investing agreement if we already had
millions of dollars on the table. However, at this point, what we
have on the table is the "possibility" that we will have
a substantial amount of financial resources to fund their
projects. Hospitals and universities will be reluctant to commit
to any substantial arrangement with us simply based on the "possibility"
that we may help their project take off.
However, that does not
mean that there is no hope for an investing agreement. If we can
live up to our mandate and come up with a respectable amount of
funding in the process, we might be able to negotiate something
like a right of first refusal to the eventual licensing rights,
although there is no guarantee that this will be the case.
But the bottom line is
that we will be ahead of ourselves if we start off talking about
investing right at the beginning. It appears that unencumbered
funding is the way to go for now until we have a better idea how
much funds we can raise, then we can explore the investing idea
further.
Similarly, the idea of raising funds through an IPO may suffer
from the same set back. It will be impossible to raise public
funds if we do not already have the exclusive licensing agreement
in place. However, no universities or hospitals will give us the
exclusive right in the absence of solid financing scheme on
the bargaining table.
|
|
FORMAT
CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION vs SIMPLIFIED FUNDING |
|
The conventional way of
raising funds is through a 501(c)(3) charitable
organization. However, a registered charitable organization also
comes with unnecessary burden such as record keeping, issuance of
tax receipts, financial statements, IRS filing and year-end audits
etc. HairSite will be buried in administrative work at the expense
of our mission if we choose to register a charitable organization
for our purpose.
In lieu of a registered charitable organization,
the "Simplied Funding Method" is more efficient without
compromising the integrity and focus of our campaign.
This is how the
"Simplified Funding Method" works,
1) Members at HairSite will select one or two researchers who are
the most promising in bringing
us the next breakthrough in hair restoration in the near future.
2) Once a consensus has been reached at HairSite as to who the
recipient(s) should be, all benefactors
will be instructed to make contributions, either by check
or money order, payable directly to the selected
researcher(s) or their associated organizations.
3) There will be no monies going through HairSite and at the same
time the contributors will receive tax receipts directly
from the designated organizations. In addition, HairSite will be
exonerated from all the accounting and administrative work since
it will be handled by the receiving organization.
4) The important thing is that those who are interested in
contributing will have
to make a pledge even before they write the check. This way
we will have a rough idea of how much we can raise through this
campaign and this is what we will bring to the bargaining table
with the researchers.
5) In order to pledge your support, you will have to fill in an
online pledge form. All information will be kept strictly
confidential. However, we will need genuine personal data for the
purpose of the pledge, mainly for two reasons: a) so that the
recipient organization of HairSite Research Fund can issue
official tax receipts to the contributor and, b) so that we will
have reasonable assurance that we will eventually collect the
amount pledged.
|
|
EVALUATING
THE CANDIDATES
PRELIMINARY SCREENING vs FINAL SCREENING |
Preliminary
Screening - the purpose is to identify researchers who are
open to funding.
Final Screening - researchers who are
open to funding will be invited to submit a detailed proposal
addressing at least the following issues:
1) Qualifications and credentials of the researchers involved in the
project.
2) Number of inventions / patents credited to the researcher.
3) Number of peer-reviewed publications related to hair
restoration.
4) Synopsis of current research as it relates to hair restoration,
its benefits and potentials.
5) Potential obstacles to the current research.
6) Pro-forma analysis of funding that will be required to bring
research to completion and detailed explanation of how the funds
will be used.
7) Existing grants or funds that are tied to the current projects
and the respective restrictions or encumbrance associated with
each.
8) A comment on how the technology will be introduced to the mass
consumers once the research has been completed and proven
successful.
9) Willingness to provide periodic updates and progress
report.
10) Willingness to collaborate with other researchers and be a joint
recipient of HairSite Research Fund.
|
|
MEDIA
KITS |
| The final
stage of our campaign will involve soliciting support from
organizations and celebrities. Media kits with information about
HairSite Research Fund and the designated researchers' work will be
mailed to prospective donors. |
|
WE
NEED HELP |
Your
help would make a huge difference in our fund raising efforts. We
need help in the following areas:
1) Any suggestions will be
greatly appreciated. Please use HM forum.
2) Your pledge.
3) If you are a graphic designer,
we need help in designing a logo for HairSite Research Fund,
letterhead, stationery, business cards, and the eventual media
kits for our project.
4) Contact info of organizations
and celebrities who may consider
supporting HairSite Research Fund.
5) Medical advisors. We need
independent and objective medical advisors who can assist us in
evaluating and screening the candidates of HairSite Research
Fund. |
|
PRELIMINARY
SCREENING
INTERIM STATUS REPORT |
Please use HM forum
for discussions regarding funding.
|
|








|