HairSite - Hair Care & Hair Loss Forums
Topic M453 - Hair Multiplication & Other Advanced Treatments (forum # 39)

[ Male Forums | Female Forums | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]

Re: TO < edited >

From: HLT
Remote Name: 24.219.109.234
Date: 26 Jul 2001
Time: 07:55 PM

Comments

<< But you failed to mention exactly who at EHRS provided or verified the information >>

The reason for this is because I wasn't quite sure they wanted their names divulged. Most people don't view my site as a site that is out to deceive and hurt people like yourself and Bill seem to, so I made sure I had my facts straight, got the names I needed and have provided them as requested.

<< Moreover, the way the source was "attributed" (in a tiny header to the article, rather than in the text of the article itself), is highly unusual and not standard journalistic practice. >>

I don't claim to be a journal, nor do I claim to be a journalist. I have a newsletter that I and a few others put together to help keep people informed. That's all. Consequently you are correct, the layout of the page doesn't fit "standard journalistic layouts". This really is not that big of an issue, at all. My focus was on the article, not the layout.

<< Nowhere in the article did you mention specifically that you HLT had contact with any sources at EHRS. >>

Again, I wasn't aware that this was a rule, nor was I aware that not doing so would justify you to write another handful of rude posts about my site. Im not out to get you guys. We're here to help. I don't know why you always need to attack.

<< Was it a direct source who provided the information to HLT? Then why don't you indicate that? The way you present your information is sometimes misleading. >>

Misleading implies an intention to deceive. There is nothing misleading about that article and you know it. Why? Because nobody meant to deceive you. You may sit here until you're blue in the face and tell everyone that is your opinion, but that does not make it a fact. Coming from the horses mouth (me) I can confirm that nobody was intending to mislead you, and this nitpicking on the layout of the article shows that you've got some weird anti-< edited > obsession going because we've done nothing to hurt you, yet you attack us about the silliest things like we've offended you on a personal level. Its absolutely ridiculous.

<< Your website was THE VERY FIRST site to publish the mysterious e-mail that started the whole "Dermal Fusion" fiasco, if I am not mistaken. From the very inception of the DF hoax, you gave a very prominent position to this e-mail on your site. >>

It was no more prominent than every other newsletter with 20 articles in it. So this comment alone once again shows that you're creating a reality that just isn't there. Nothing was more prominent about it than anything else. Once again you're implying that we did something intentionally and thats just plain false.

<< In fact, I didn't see you contribute to it at all -- all you did was keep a very misleading, UNATTRIBUTED e-mail up on your web site. >>

Your logic is incredible!!!!! We immediately requested no interest in the whole dermal fusion debate. If anything that is far more responsible and credible than setting up an entire forum dedicated to it where people mull and argue and debate over it for MONTHs only to find out that it was a bunch of hogwash. Why do you continue to insult us for one article yet ignore the fact that this very site was not only the birthplace, but the breeding ground, and the incubation and home to Dermal Fusion for the past 5 months? Are you trying to blame us for Dermal Fusion coming into existence by saying that we are the ones who "started" it? You think I hacked into David's web site and Farrel's web site? You think I then hacked into my own web site and destroyed my newsletter program last week? No. That was Eduardo and his Nova Scotian Hair Liberation Army. If you're going to insult us for a single article saying we'd heard something about it, then you better be consistent and insult this site for helping it grow into a huge unsubstantiated debate that proved to be nothing more than a fraud. That isn't HairSite's fault andymore than it's our fault for putting one article up.

<< And all that's for starters. I *do not* want to debate this subject ad nauseam here on Hairsite, because this is not the proper forum for my opinions about your site.>>

Then why do you continue to post here and not reply to the email I sent you? I emailed you back for a reason, yet you said nothing. Then I come here two weeks later and you're talking smack once again and even mocking the fact that I tried to email you about this instead of keep it in a public forum. Once again you're incredibly inconsistent.

<< I would like to have a civil discussion of the matter with you, and believe we can share ideas respectfully. >>

I am not seeing this capability from you. Im seeing insults and accusations of misleading, lying, and deception. You have made assumptions on our intentions based entirely on thin air, and commented on them like they are facts. That is not a civil adult way of exchanging thoughts. No matter how you look at it. And there is nothing respectful about it either.

<< For someone as obviously intelligent and talented as you are (aesthetically the web site is very professional looking -- I don't know if you designed it but the format and "look" is well-done). >>>

Im surprised you don't accuse me of having some ulterior motive to deceive people with my site's "look" as well. It would make just about as much sense as everything else.

<< But content-wise, the site leaves a lot to be desired. >>

Would you like me to open some Dermal Fusion forums instead? Then would my content be better in your opinion? Or would my content degrade to nothing more than a bunch of men with too much time on their hands bickering and insulting eachother only to find out they'd been lead on by a complete fraud the whole time. Then would my site content be better? Hm? Way to make no sense.

<< When you do publish information first ("scooping" competing sites), there unfortunately is a consistent pattern of presenting such information in a misleading or sensationalistic way. >>

Three phrases for you in response to this:

Dermal Fusion Dr. Gho HairSite

PS... your comment about "Scooping" competing sites says volumes for your motives for all these insults. Nobody here is competing, however you do sound like someone who has a vested interest in making my site look dishonest. The very fact that you even mention competing and scooping makes me wonder.

Im in this to help people. My "helpers" are in this to help people. We aren't here to fight, insult others seeking help, or get insulted by you. Id love to talk to you on the phone because I would be willing to bet you'd be nowhere near as insulting or unfair in your comments if we did. Most likely because you wouldn't have an audience.

poker

From: poker
Remote Name: 61.248.238.210
Date: 14 Mar 2006
Time: 03:36 AM

Comments

poker http://poker1.100free.com/ <a href="http://poker1.100free.com/">poker</a> [URL="http://poker1.100free.com/"]poker[/URL]

Last changed: April 18, 2007

© Copyright 1997 - 2001  TSE Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this website can be reproduced. Contact info: HairSite@aol.com